Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 829
Publisher
MDPI AG
Online
2019-03-08
DOI
10.3390/ijerph16050829
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Midfacial Tissue Assessment of the Effect of Amount of Keratinized Mucosa on Immediate Temporarization of Fresh Socket Implants: 8-Year Follow-up
- (2018) Roberto Crespi et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
- Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation
- (2018) Paolo Pesce et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS
- Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners
- (2018) Joshua C. Treesh et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison
- (2018) Robert Nedelcu et al. BMC Oral Health
- A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions
- (2018) Emad A. Albdour et al. BMC Oral Health
- Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions
- (2018) Priscilla Medina-Sotomayor et al. PLoS One
- Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant-supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review
- (2018) Sven Mühlemann et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan
- (2018) Gun-Hong Park et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Digital versus Traditional Workflow for Posterior Maxillary Rehabilitations Supported by One Straight and One Tilted Implant: A 3-Year Prospective Comparative Study
- (2018) Francesco Ferrini et al. Biomed Research International
- Digital Workflow for Fixed Implant Rehabilitation of an Extremely Atrophic Edentulous Mandible in Three Appointments
- (2017) Panos Papaspyridakos et al. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
- Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo
- (2017) Moritz Zimmermann et al. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie
- A combined digital and stereophotogrammetric technique for rehabilitation with immediate loading of complete-arch, implant-supported prostheses: A randomized controlled pilot clinical trial
- (2017) María Peñarrocha-Diago et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study
- (2017) Mario Imburgia et al. BMC Oral Health
- Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature
- (2017) Francesco Mangano et al. BMC Oral Health
- Immediate Occlusal Loading of Full-Arch Rehabilitations: Screw-Retained Versus Cement-Retained Prosthesis. An 8-Year Clinical Evaluation
- (2017) Roberto Crespi et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
- The Influence of Digital Fabrication Options on the Accuracy of Dental Implant–Based Single Units and Complete-Arch Frameworks
- (2017) Tamer Abdel-Azim et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
- Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study
- (2016) Sarah Amin et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Conventional Versus Digital Impressions for “All-on-Four” Restorations
- (2016) Enrico Gherlone et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
- Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review
- (2016) Pekka Ahlholm et al. Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
- Clinical Fitting and Adjustment Time for Implant-Supported Crowns Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows
- (2015) Tim Joda et al. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- Digital Impressions for Fabrication of Definitive “All-on-Four” Restorations
- (2015) Enrico Felice Gherlone et al. Implant Dentistry
- Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference
- (2015) Ulf Schepke et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Intraoral Digital Impression Technique Compared to Conventional Impression Technique. A Randomized Clinical Trial
- (2015) Björn Gjelvold et al. Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
- All-on-4® Treatment Concept for the Rehabilitation of the Completely Edentulous Mandible: A 7-Year Clinical and 5-Year Radiographic Retrospective Case Series with Risk Assessment for Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Level
- (2014) Paulo Maló et al. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns
- (2014) Tim Joda et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis
- (2014) Tim Joda et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Parallel Confocal Laser Technology for Implants with Consideration of Operator Experience and Implant Angulation and Depth
- (2014) Beatriz Giménez et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
- A 3 years retrospective study of survival for zirconia-based single crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions
- (2014) Enrico Gherlone et al. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
- Clinical Study of Flap Design to Increase the Keratinized Gingiva Around Implants: 4-Year Follow-Up
- (2014) Giovanni B Bruschi et al. Journal of Oral Implantology
- Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review
- (2014) Su Ting-shu et al. Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
- Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes
- (2014) Emir Yuzbasioglu et al. BMC Oral Health
- Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner
- (2013) Tabea V. Flügge et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
- Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology for Implants Considering Operator Experience, Implant Angulation, and Depth
- (2013) Beatriz Giménez et al. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants
- (2013) Daniel Wismeijer et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions
- (2013) Sang J. Lee et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow
- (2012) Paul Seelbach et al. Clinical Oral Investigations
- Application of Intra-Oral Dental Scanners in the Digital Workflow of Implantology
- (2012) Wicher J. van der Meer et al. PLoS One
- Localized Management of Sinus Floor Technique for Implant Placement in Fresh Molar Sockets
- (2011) Giovanni B. Bruschi et al. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation: A Retrospective Study of 46 Patients up to 16 Years
- (2010) Giovanni B Bruschi et al. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous jaws with full fixed prostheses supported by four implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study
- (2010) Enrico Agliardi et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Classification of Extraction Sockets Based Upon Soft and Hard Tissue Components
- (2008) Gintaras Juodzbalys et al. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search