Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant-supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant-supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 184-195
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-10-11
DOI
10.1111/clr.13300
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures
- (2017) Irena Sailer et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial
- (2016) Tim Joda et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial
- (2016) Tim Joda et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- A Technique for Duplicating the Contours of an Interim Implant Supported Crown to Fabricate a Custom Impression Coping and the Definitive Prosthesis
- (2016) Frederico Vasconcellos et al. Implant Dentistry
- A Technique to Transfer the Emergence Profile Contours of a Provisional Implant Crown to the Definitive Impression
- (2016) Karnik Shah et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
- Conventional Versus Digital Impressions for “All-on-Four” Restorations
- (2016) Enrico Gherlone et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
- Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions
- (2016) Goran I. Benic et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Clinical Fitting and Adjustment Time for Implant-Supported Crowns Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows
- (2015) Tim Joda et al. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- Time-Efficiency Analysis Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows for Implant Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Crossover Trial
- (2015) Tim Joda et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
- Use of an Intraoral Laser Scanner During the Prosthetic Phase of Implant Dentistry: A Pilot Study
- (2015) Cameron Y. S. Lee et al. Journal of Oral Implantology
- Critical appraisal of implant impression accuracies: A systematic review
- (2015) Jee-Hwan Kim et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference
- (2015) Ulf Schepke et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns
- (2014) Tim Joda et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis
- (2014) Tim Joda et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Accuracy of Impressions of Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Arch: A Systematic Review
- (2014) Mirza Baig INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
- Accuracy of Implant Impressions for Partially and Completely Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review
- (2014) Panos Papaspyridakos et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
- Impressions Are Changing
- (2014) Gordon J. Christensen JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
- The time efficiency of intraoral scanners
- (2014) Sebastian B.M. Patzelt et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
- Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants
- (2013) Daniel Wismeijer et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Managing the Peri-implant Mucosa: A Clinically Reliable Method for Optimizing Soft Tissue Contours and Emergence Profile
- (2013) Andrea Parpaiola et al. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
- Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes
- (2012) Sang J. Lee et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- A Method for Obtaining Peri-Implant Soft-Tissue Contours by Using Screw-Retained Provisional Restorations as Impression Copings: A Clinical Report
- (2010) Bi-Yuan Tsai Journal of Oral Implantology
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Restoring implants in the esthetic zone after sculpting and capturing the periimplant tissues in rest position: A clinical report
- (2009) Panagiota-Eirini Spyropoulou et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- The accuracy of implant impressions: A systematic review
- (2008) Heeje Lee et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started