4.7 Article

Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculation and Design of a Subnanomolar Inhibitor of Phosphodiesterase-10

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 2099-2111

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01763

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0202600]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21572279, 21877134, 81522041, 21402243]
  3. Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030313215, 2014A020210009]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Sun Yat-Sen University) [17ykjc03, 18ykpy23]
  5. Guangdong Province Higher Vocational Colleges & Schools Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2016)
  6. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CHE-1111761]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate prediction of absolute protein ligand binding free energy could considerably enhance the success rate of structure-based drug design but is extremely challenging and time-consuming. Free energy perturbation (FEP) has been proven reliable but is limited to prediction of relative binding free energies of similar ligands (with only minor structural differences) in binding with a same drug target in practical drug design applications. Herein, a Gaussian algorithm-enhanced FEP (GA-FEP) protocol has been developed to enhance the FEP simulation performance, enabling to efficiently carry out the FEP simulations on vanishing the whole ligand and, thus, predict the absolute binding free energies (ABFEs). Using the GA-FEP protocol, the FEP simulations for the ABFE calculation (denoted as GA-FEP/ABFE) can achieve a satisfactory accuracy for both structurally similar and diverse ligands in a dataset of more than 100 receptor ligand systems. Further, our GA-FEP/ABFE-guided lead optimization against phosphodiesterase-10 led to the discovery of a subnanomolar inhibitor (IC50 = 0.87 nM, similar to 2000-fold improvement in potency) with cocrystal confirmation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available