4.7 Article

An optimization model for managing stakeholder conflicts in urban redevelopment projects in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages 537-547

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.071

Keywords

Urban redevelopment projects; Stakeholder conflicts; Stakeholder salience theory; Pawlak's conflict theory

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71771178]
  2. MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences [18YJCZH092]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid urbanization process in China has given rise to a number of sustainability issues, including land shortages, concentrated areas of poverty, inefficient land use, and environmental pollution. Urban redevelopment has been identified as an effective method for addressing these issues and establishing new modes of sustainable urban development. In practice, urban redevelopment projects typically involve a range of stakeholders with competing claims. Managing the conflicting interests of these stakeholders presents a significant challenge to the success of urban redevelopment. In this study, we proposed a model for analyzing stakeholder conflicts in urban redevelopment projects based on the stakeholder salience theory and Pawlak's conflict theory. In this model, the attributes, key concerns, and attitudes of different stakeholders are captured by empirical investigation and salience analysis. Stakeholder conflicts are then quantified using Pawlak's conflict theory with consideration of stakeholder specifics. Finally, an action scheme is generated that mitigates stakeholder conflicts and maximizes project benefits. To evaluate its effectiveness, we applied this model to a real redevelopment project in the Wenzhou Ecological Park. The results indicate that this model can be used to balance the interests of stakeholders and reduce stakeholder conflicts in urban redevelopment projects in China. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available