4.3 Article

Comparative Analyses of DHA-Phosphatidylcholine Forage and Liposomes on Alzheimer's Disease in SAMP8 Mice

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ejlt.201800524

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; cognitive deficiency; DHA-phosphatidylcholine; liposomes

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD0901103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China-Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers [U1606403]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201762028]
  4. Qingdao Postdoctoral Application Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present work comparatively evaluates the efficacy of docosahexaenoic acid - phosphatidylcholine (DHA-PC) forage and liposome on Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the senescence-accelerated prone 8 (SAMP8) mice and illustrates the potential mechanism. The dose of DHA-PC in forage group (1% of total diets) is equal to that of liposome group. The results of Morris maze test show that both DHA-PC forage and liposome obviously alleviated cognitive impairment (P<0.05). Moreover, the administration of DHA-PC liposome shows advantage than forage in reducing beta-amyloid (A beta) accumulation (P<0.05). Meanwhile, DHA-PC forage exhibits excellent inhibition on the IL-1 beta protein expression (P<0.05) and improvement in the protein levels of SYN and BDNF (P<0.05). These data are the first to perform comparative analysis of DHA-PC forage and liposome on AD.Practical Applications: The outcomes in the present study might help to understand the bioactivities of DHA-PC forage and liposomes, which might exert potential application value for dietary supplement with neuroprotective effects. Both docosahexaenoic acid - phosphatidylcholine (DHA-PC) forage and liposome shows benefits in alleviating Alzheimer's disease development in senescence-accelerated prone 8 mice by inhibiting beta-amyloid generation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, neural inflammation, and enhancing neurotrophins pathway in different degrees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available