Bayesian and parsimony approaches reconstruct informative trees from simulated morphological datasets
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Bayesian and parsimony approaches reconstruct informative trees from simulated morphological datasets
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Biology Letters
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 20180632
Publisher
The Royal Society
Online
2019-02-06
DOI
10.1098/rsbl.2018.0632
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Parsimony and model-based phylogenetic methods for morphological data: comments on O'Reilly et al .
- (2018) Pablo A. Goloboff et al. PALAEONTOLOGY
- Probabilistic methods outperform parsimony in the phylogenetic analysis of data simulated without a probabilistic model
- (2018) Mark N. Puttick et al. PALAEONTOLOGY
- ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates
- (2017) Subha Kalyaanamoorthy et al. NATURE METHODS
- Probabilistic methods surpass parsimony when assessing clade support in phylogenetic analyses of discrete morphological data
- (2017) Joseph E. O'Reilly et al. PALAEONTOLOGY
- Bayesian and likelihood phylogenetic reconstructions of morphological traits are not discordant when taking uncertainty into consideration: a comment on Puttick et al .
- (2017) Joseph W. Brown et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Parsimony and maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analyses of morphology do not generally integrate uncertainty in inferring evolutionary history: a response to Brown et al.
- (2017) Mark N. Puttick et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Uncertain-tree: discriminating among competing approaches to the phylogenetic analysis of phenotype data
- (2017) Mark N. Puttick et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data
- (2016) Joseph E. O'Reilly et al. Biology Letters
- Implied weighting and its utility in palaeontological datasets: a study using modelled phylogenetic matrices
- (2016) Curtis R. Congreve et al. PALAEONTOLOGY
- Identifying unstable taxa: Efficient implementation of triplet-based measures of stability, and comparison with Phyutility and RogueNaRok
- (2015) Pablo A. Goloboff et al. MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
- Total-Evidence Dating under the Fossilized Birth–Death Process
- (2015) Chi Zhang et al. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
- tqDist: a library for computing the quartet and triplet distances between binary or general trees
- (2014) Andreas Sand et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- Bayesian Analysis Using a Simple Likelihood Model Outperforms Parsimony for Estimation of Phylogeny from Discrete Morphological Data
- (2014) April M. Wright et al. PLoS One
- Rates of Phenotypic and Genomic Evolution during the Cambrian Explosion
- (2013) Michael S.Y. Lee et al. CURRENT BIOLOGY
- Behaviour of resampling methods under different weighting schemes, measures and variable resampling strengths
- (2009) Cecilia Kopuchian et al. CLADISTICS
- TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis
- (2008) Pablo A. Goloboff et al. CLADISTICS
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started