Scandinavian SSAI clinical practice guideline on choice of first-line vasopressor for patients with acute circulatory failure
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Scandinavian SSAI clinical practice guideline on choice of first-line vasopressor for patients with acute circulatory failure
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 60, Issue 10, Pages 1347-1366
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2016-08-31
DOI
10.1111/aas.12780
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Mortality in Multicenter Critical Care Trials
- (2015) Giovanni Landoni et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine
- (2015) Ib Jammer et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY
- Ten ‘short-lived’ beliefs in intensive care medicine
- (2015) Anders Perner et al. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
- The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change
- (2015) I. Roberts et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change
- (2015) I. Roberts et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2015) Tomer Avni et al. PLoS One
- Scandinavian clinical practice guideline on choice of fluid in resuscitation of critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure
- (2014) A. PERNER et al. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
- Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of VAsopressin versus Noradrenaline as Initial therapy in Septic sHock (VANISH)
- (2014) A. C. Gordon et al. BMJ Open
- Trustworthy Clinical Guidelines
- (2013) Christine Laine et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines
- (2013) Amir Qaseem ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials
- (2013) Jelena Savović et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Circulatory Shock
- (2013) Jean-Louis Vincent et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Comparison of treatment effect sizes associated with surrogate and final patient relevant outcomes in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study
- (2013) O. Ciani et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Dopamine versus norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock
- (2011) Daniel De Backer et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Vasopressin for treatment of vasodilatory shock: an ESICM systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2011) Angelo Polito et al. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence
- (2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
- (2010) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock
- (2010) Daniel De Backer et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Effects of short-term simultaneous infusion of dobutamine and terlipressin in patients with septic shock: the DOBUPRESS study † †This study was performed in the Intensive Care Unit of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of the University of Rome, ‘La Sapienza’.
- (2008) A. Morelli et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
- A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients
- (2008) John A. Myburgh et al. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
- Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock
- (2008) James A. Russell et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started