Repurposing large health insurance claims data to estimate genetic and environmental contributions in 560 phenotypes
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Repurposing large health insurance claims data to estimate genetic and environmental contributions in 560 phenotypes
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
NATURE GENETICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2019-01-08
DOI
10.1038/s41588-018-0313-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Disease Heritability Inferred from Familial Relationships Reported in Medical Records
- (2018) Fernanda C.G. Polubriaginof et al. CELL
- Identifying gene targets for brain-related traits using transcriptomic and methylomic data from blood
- (2018) Ting Qi et al. Nature Communications
- Classification of common human diseases derived from shared genetic and environmental determinants
- (2017) Kanix Wang et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Focusing on High-Cost Patients — The Key to Addressing High Costs?
- (2017) J. Michael McWilliams et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Why Your ZIP Code Matters More Than Your Genetic Code: Promoting Healthy Outcomes from Mother to Child
- (2016) Garth N. Graham Breastfeeding Medicine
- US Spending on Personal Health Care and Public Health, 1996-2013
- (2016) Joseph L. Dieleman et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Linear mixed model for heritability estimation that explicitly addresses environmental variation
- (2016) David Heckerman et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Comparison of Twin and Extended Pedigree Designs for Obtaining Heritability Estimates
- (2015) Anna R. Docherty et al. BEHAVIOR GENETICS
- Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4
- (2015) Douglas Bates et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies
- (2015) Tinca J C Polderman et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Contrasting genetic architectures of schizophrenia and other complex diseases using fast variance-components analysis
- (2015) Po-Ru Loh et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics
- (2015) Hilary K Finucane et al. NATURE GENETICS
- A New Initiative on Precision Medicine
- (2015) Francis S. Collins et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Revisiting heritability accounting for shared environmental effects and maternal inheritance
- (2014) Chunyu Liu et al. HUMAN GENETICS
- A Nondegenerate Code of Deleterious Variants in Mendelian Loci Contributes to Complex Disease Risk
- (2013) David R. Blair et al. CELL
- A comparison of phenotype definitions for diabetes mellitus
- (2013) Rachel L Richesson et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
- Systematic comparison of phenome-wide association study of electronic medical record data and genome-wide association study data
- (2013) Joshua C Denny et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Estimating the proportion of variation in susceptibility to schizophrenia captured by common SNPs
- (2012) S Hong Lee et al. NATURE GENETICS
- The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era
- (2012) Jenny van Dongen et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- The Predictive Capacity of Personal Genome Sequencing
- (2012) N. J. Roberts et al. Science Translational Medicine
- The Genetic Interpretation of Area under the ROC Curve in Genomic Profiling
- (2010) Naomi R. Wray et al. PLoS Genetics
- Rank-Based Inverse Normal Transformations are Increasingly Used, But are They Merited?
- (2009) T. Mark Beasley et al. BEHAVIOR GENETICS
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started