4.7 Article

Loss of work productivity in a warming world: Differences between developed and developing countries

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages 1219-1225

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.067

Keywords

Heat waves; Work productivity loss; Representative concentration pathways; Global warming targets; Adaptation; Mitigation

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0602503]
  2. Chinese Academy of Science Program [XDA20020201]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41405082, 41475078]
  4. Beijing Information Science and Technology University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparable estimates of the heat-related work productivity loss (WPL) in different countries over the world are difficult partly due to the lack of exact measures and comparable data for different counties. In this study, we analysed 4363 responses to a global online survey on the WPL during heat waves in 2016. The participants were from both developed and developing countries, facilitating estimates of the heat related WPL across the world for the year. The heat-related WPL for each country involved was then deduced for increases of 1.5, 2, 3 and 4 degrees C in the global mean surface temperature under the representative concentration pathway scenarios in climate models. The average heat-related WPL in 2016 was 6.6 days for developing countries and 3.5 days for developed countries. The estimated heat-related WPL was negatively correlated with the gross domestic product per capita. When global surface temperatures increased by 1.5, 2, 3 and 4 degrees C, the corresponding WPL was 9 (19), 12 (31), 22 (61) and 33 (94) days for developed (developing) countries, quantifying how developing countries are more vulnerable to climate change from a particular point of view. Moreover, the heat-related WPL was unevenly distributed among developing countries. In a 2 degrees C-warmer world, the heat-related WPL would be more than two months in Southeast Asia, the most influenced region. The results are considerable for developing strategy of adaptation especially for developing countries. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available