4.5 Article

Quantitative assessment of 4D hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms using proper orthogonal decomposition

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 80-86

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.10.014

Keywords

Intracranial aneurysms; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PC-MRI); Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD); Flow visualization; Quantitative comparison

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany within the Research Campus STIMULATE [13GW0095A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: The comparison of different time-varying three-dimensional hemodynamic data (4D) is a formidable task. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential of the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) for a quantitative assessment. Methods: The complex spatial-temporal flow information was analyzed using proper orthogonal decomposition to reduce the complexity of the system. PC-MRI blood flow measurements and computational fluid dynamic simulations of two subject-specific IAs were used to compare the different flow modalities. The concept of Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) provided a further detailed objective characterization of the most energetic individual modes. Results: The most energetic flow modes were qualitatively compared by visual inspection. The distribution of the kinetic energy on the modes was used to quantitatively compare pulsatile flow data, where the most energetic mode was associated to approximately 90% of the total kinetic energy. This distribution was incorporated in a single measure, termed spectral entropy, showing good agreement especially for Case 1. Conclusion: The proposed quantitative POD-based technique could be a valuable tool to reduce the complexity of the time-dependent hemodynamic data and to facilitate an easy comparison of 4D flows, e.g., for validation purposes. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available