4.7 Article

SelCSP: A Framework to Facilitate Selection of Cloud Service Providers

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CLOUD COMPUTING
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 66-79

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCC.2014.2328578

Keywords

Cloud; service provider; trust; reputation; relational risk; performance risk; competence; service level agreement; control; transparency

Funding

  1. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  2. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1404677] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With rapid technological advancements, cloud marketplace witnessed frequent emergence of new service providers with similar offerings. However, service level agreements (SLAs), which document guaranteed quality of service levels, have not been found to be consistent among providers, even though they offer services with similar functionality. In service outsourcing environments, like cloud, the quality of service levels are of prime importance to customers, as they use third-party cloud services to store and process their clients' data. If loss of data occurs due to an outage, the customer's business gets affected. Therefore, the major challenge for a customer is to select an appropriate service provider to ensure guaranteed service quality. To support customers in reliably identifying ideal service provider, this work proposes a framework, SelCSP, which combines trustworthiness and competence to estimate risk of interaction. Trustworthiness is computed from personal experiences gained through direct interactions or from feedbacks related to reputations of vendors. Competence is assessed based on transparency in provider's SLA guarantees. A case study has been presented to demonstrate the application of our approach. Experimental results validate the practicability of the proposed estimating mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available