Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics
Published 2011 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 116-137
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2011-07-20
DOI
10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01522.x
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Quantity and quality assessment of randomized controlled trials on orthodontic practice in PubMed
- (2010) Tatsuo Shimada et al. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST
- Systematic Reviews of Topical Fluorides for Dental Caries: A Review of Reporting Practice
- (2010) S. Ijaz et al. CARIES RESEARCH
- Knowledge of European orthodontic postgraduate students on biostatistics
- (2010) A. Polychronopoulou et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
- Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research
- (2010) David Chavalarias et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Evidence-based periodontal plastic surgery: an assessment of quality of systematic reviews in the treatment of recession-type defects
- (2010) Leandro Chambrone et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
- An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals
- (2010) Nikolaos Pandis et al. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
- A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Meta-analyses in Endodontics
- (2010) Siriwan Suebnukarn et al. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
- Management of TMD: evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- (2010) T. LIST et al. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
- (2010) Hilda Bastian et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Assessment of Publication Bias in Dental Specialty Journals
- (2010) Argy Polychronopoulou et al. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
- Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
- (2009) Khalid Al Faleh et al. BMC Pediatrics
- Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals
- (2009) Abhaya V. Kulkarni JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
- (2009) Beverley J. Shea et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Publication bias in oral and maxillofacial surgery journals: An observation on published controlled trials
- (2009) Poramate Pitak-Arnnop et al. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
- What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature?
- (2009) Peter C Gøtzsche et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews
- (2008) Margaret Sampson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster
- (2008) Margaret Sampson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The methodological quality of systematic reviews comparing temporomandibular joint disorder surgical and non-surgical treatment
- (2008) Ricardo V Bessa-Nogueira et al. BMC Oral Health
- Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots
- (2008) John P A Ioannidis et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started