When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals
出版年份 2015 全文链接
标题
When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals
作者
关键词
-
出版物
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 191-199
出版商
Wiley
发表日期
2015-01-09
DOI
10.1002/asi.23369
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?
- (2014) Amalia Mas-Bleda et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community
- (2014) Stefanie Haustein et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications
- (2014) Zohreh Zahedi et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication
- (2014) Kim Holmberg et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics
- (2014) Hadas Shema et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows
- (2014) Ehsan Mohammadi et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
- (2013) Mike Thelwall et al. PLoS One
- Social Media Release Increases Dissemination of Original Articles in the Clinical Pain Sciences
- (2013) Heidi G. Allen et al. PLoS One
- Evaluating altmetrics
- (2013) Pardeep Sud et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review
- (2013) Marco Pautasso PLoS Computational Biology
- Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature
- (2013) Stefanie Haustein et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Citations and thehindex of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar
- (2013) Budiman Minasny et al. PeerJ
- The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
- (2013) Bo-Christer Björk et al. Journal of Informetrics
- How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations
- (2012) Xin Shuai et al. PLoS One
- LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization: a comparison between Web of Science and Scopus
- (2012) A. Abrizah et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
- (2011) Gunther Eysenbach JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement
- (2011) Xuemei Li et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- A combined bibliometric indicator to predict article impact
- (2010) Jonathan M. Levitt et al. INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT
- National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States
- (2010) Xi Niu et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns
- (2009) Carol Tenopir et al. ASLIB PROCEEDINGS
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started