4.6 Article

Morphological and structural evolution from akaganeite to hematite of nanorods monitored by ex situ synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 34, Pages 17753-17759

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra42753f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FAPESP [2012/19926-8, 2011/19924-2, 2008/10537-3]
  2. CNPq [305186/2012-4, 477296/2011-4, 473669/2012-9]
  3. CAPES
  4. LNLS
  5. CEM-UFABC
  6. INCTMN
  7. NANOBIOMED CAPES network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hematite (alpha-Fe2O3) is one of the most abundant minerals in nature and a thermodynamically-stable phase of iron oxide. One-dimensional (1D) hematite nanostructures have attracted, due to their fundamental characteristics such as excellent chemical stability in aqueous environments and low cost, considerable interest for a series of technical applications (as sensors, catalysis, lithium ion batteries and solar energy production and storage). Our study describes the phase evolution of iron oxide nanorods, from beta-FeOOH to alpha-Fe2O3, with increasing temperatures of thermal treatment monitored by ex situ synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data. These data used in conjunction with the Rietveld method allowed us to infer the phase concentration, elucidate the influence of temperature on the unit cell parameters and preferred growth orientation of the nanorods. Only the use of synchrotron radiation allowed us to precisely identify and quantify the presence of a minor Fe2O3 phase, which has never before been reported for those systems. Moreover, the formation of one-dimensional nanorods was accompanied by using scanning and transmission electron microscopies (SEM and TEM). At the highest temperatures of thermal treatments the hematite nanorods exhibited changes that varied from a quasi-perfect crystal up to polycrystalline rods (> 500 degrees C). These findings were used for discussing and explaining recent results using this kind of nanostructure synthesized under hydrothermal conditions. Changes in the preferred orientation of the crystal faces of the rods could be responsible for a low photocatalytic performance reported by this strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available