4.6 Article

Electrospun barium titanate/cobalt ferrite composite fibers with improved magnetoelectric performance

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 98, Pages 55217-55223

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra09449b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP0665856]
  2. ARC
  3. Australian Research Council [DP0665856] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we use a versatile sol-gel based electrospinning technique to fabricate nanostructured barium titanate (BaTiO3)/cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) composite fibers and analyze their magnetoelectric response. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy images indicate that the obtained fibers are composed of fine grains which are self-assembled and arranged. X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies of the composite fibers revealed the presence of perovskite and spinel structures corresponding to BaTiO3 and CoFe2O4 phases, respectively. The magnetic hysteresis loops of the resultant fibers showed that the fibers were ferromagnetic with magnetic coercivity of 650 Oe and saturation magnetization of 31 emu g(-1). Moreover, the magnetoelectric coefficient developed on the surface of the fibers was measured as a function of the applied external DC magnetic field. A maximum magnetoelectric coefficient of 13.3 mV cm(-1) Oe(-1) was determined for the composite fibers, which is much higher than the commonly reported values for bulk or thin film counterparts. The large magnetoelectric coefficient of the composite fibers was attributed to the nano-sized grains and their arrangement within the fibrous geometry. The intimate contact and the large interfacial area presented by the nanostructures ensured that the composites displayed strong magnetoelectric behavior. Such composite fibers show tremendous potential for magnetic field sensor applications and for magnetoelectric devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available