4.6 Article

Effect of a ZrO2 support on Cu/Fe2O3-CeO2/ZrO2 catalysts for NO removal by CO using a rotary reactor

Journal

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 21, Pages 5623-5631

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8cy01546e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776113, 51776114]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017MEE035]
  3. Key R&D Program Funds of Shandong Province [2017GSF17122]
  4. Foundation of Shandong University for Young Scholar's Future Plan [2017WLJH29]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of a ZrO2 support on the activity and adsorption behavior of Cu/Fe2O3-CeO2/ZrO2 catalysts was investigated by BET, XRD, SEM, Raman, H-2-TPR and XPS. The NO removal performance of these catalysts in a rotary reactor at 150 degrees C was correlated with their catalytic activity for NO + CO, and the surface processes occurring upon NO + O-2 interaction with the catalysts were studied by in situ DRIFTS. The results showed that the doping of suitable amounts of ceria into the zirconia lattice would lead to contraction of its lattice and an increase in bulk defects, which could promote the oxygen mobility and enhance the interaction between Cu/Fe2O3-CeO2/ZrO2 and ZrO2. The ZrO2 support could increase the concentration of oxygen vacancies, which could promote the dissociation of oxygen molecules and increase the activity for NO oxidation. The surface oxygen contributed to the conversion of NO2 into stable nitrates and the low concentration of surface oxygen promoted the formation of labile nitrites. The remarkably high NO removal efficiency was attributed to the significantly enhanced adsorption of unstable adsorbed NOx species (i.e., free nitrate ions and nitrosyl) and diminished stable adsorbed NOx species (i.e., bidentate nitrate and bridged nitrate) via Cu/Fe2O3-CeO2/ZrO2 support interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available