4.1 Article

Investigation of novel ropinirole analogues: synthesis, pharmacological evaluation and computational analysis of dopamine D2 receptor functionalized congeners and homobivalent ligands

Journal

MEDCHEMCOMM
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages 891-898

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4md00066h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award Industry (APAI)
  2. Monash University Postgraduate Publication Award
  3. GSK RD Singapore
  4. Marie Curie IEF grant
  5. Interdisciplinary Center for Mathematical and Computational Modelling (ICM), Warsaw, Poland [G30-18]
  6. CSC, Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, we report the development of novel functionalized congeners of ropinirole toward the design of pharmacological tools to probe structural requirements at the dopamine D-2 receptor. Subsequently, we have used the functionalized amine congener 11 and synthesized and pharmacologically evaluated a series of homobivalent ligands of ropinirole with designated spacer lengths ranging from 14 to 30 atoms. The most potent homobivalent ligands (22-, 26- and 30- atom spacers) showed approximately 20- to 80- fold greater potency (EC50 3.9, 6.2 and 14 nM, respectively) than ropinirole (304 nM) in a [S-35] GTP gamma S functional assay. Molecular modeling studies suggest that the observed increase in potency of the homobivalent ligands is possibly due to a bitopic binding mode involving the orthosteric site and an allosteric interaction at the dopamine D-2 receptor protomer rather than bridging interactions at two orthosteric sites across a dopamine D-2 receptor dimer. This research has the potential to advance the development of structurally related bitopic ligands, biomarkers such as radioligands and fluorescently labeled probes, and furnish new homo- and heterobivalent ligands towards a better understanding of the dopamine D-2 receptor and potential novel treatment for Parkinson's disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available