Journal
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009WR008228
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Environmental Protection Agency
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Many advocates of water quality trading in the United States frequently assume that agricultural nonpoint sources will be the primary trading partner for regulated point sources. Virginia requires regulated point sources to offset new nutrient discharges. Nutrient offsets generated by agricultural nonpoint source reductions are compared against urban nonpoint source and nutrient assimilation offsets. Evidence suggests that agricultural nonpoint source offsets may not be a technically feasible or particularly cost effective compliance option for regulated point sources.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available