WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
WATER RESOUR RES
ISSN / eISSN
0043-1397 / 1944-7973
Aims and Scope
Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
Subject Area
LIMNOLOGY
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.80
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science - Water Science and Technology | Q1 | #21/248 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | Quartile |
---|---|
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES - SCIE | Q2 |
LIMNOLOGY - SCIE | Q1 |
WATER RESOURCES - SCIE | Q1 |
H-index
183
Country/Area of Publication
UNITED STATES
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Publication Frequency
Monthly
Year Publication Started
1965
Annual Article Volume
689
Open Access
NO
Contact
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20009
Verified Reviews
This article took almost 1 year from start to finish. Below, I will mainly talk about my submission process and experience:
I submitted the first version in December 2021, and then received the first round of review comments in March. After being rejected, I resubmitted, but the suggestions from the three reviewers were very helpful. They basically helped me revise the article thoroughly. After 4 months of revision, I resubmitted in July. In October, I received the second round of review comments. One of the experts in the second review was the same as before, while the other two were new. The final result was two minor revisions and one moderate revision. The editor ultimately requested a minor revision, and the changes were not too many, mainly addressing the questions raised by the three reviewers. I resubmitted in November, and the editor responded quickly, giving the acceptance decision within two days.
Overall, this submission brought me great gains. The suggestions and questions from the reviewers of WRR had a significant impact, especially for someone like me who is not good at writing articles.
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started