4.8 Article

High-rate anaerobic treatment of Fischer-Tropsch wastewater in a packed-bed biofilm reactor

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 9, Pages 2745-2752

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.008

Keywords

Anaerobic treatment; Gibbs free energy; Fischer-Tropsch wastewater; Long-chain alcohols; Packed-bed biofilm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the anaerobic treatment of an industrial wastewater from a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process in a continuous-flow packed-bed biofilm reactor operated under mesophilic conditions (35 degrees C). The considered synthetic wastewater has an overall chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration of around 28 g/L, mainly due to alcohols. A gradual increase of the organic load rate (OLR), from 3.4 gCOD/L/d up to 20 gCOD/L/d, was adopted in order to overcome potential inhibitory effects due to long-chain alcohols (>C6). At the highest applied OLR (i.e., 20 gCOD/L/d) and a hydraulic retention time of 1.4 d, the COD removal was 96% with nearly complete conversion of the removed COD into methane. By considering a potential of 200 tCOD/d to be treated, this would correspond to a net production of electric energy of about 8 x 10(7) kWh/year. During stable reactor operation, a COD balance and batch tests showed that about 80% of the converted COD was directly metabolized through H(2)(-) and acetate-releasing reactions, which proceeded in close syntrophic cooperation with hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogenesis (contributing to about 33% and 54% of overall methane production, respectively). Finally, energetic considerations indicated that propionic acid oxidation was the metabolic conversion step most dependent on the syntrophic partnership of hydrogenotrophic methanogens and accordingly the most susceptible to variations of the applied OLR or toxicity effects. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available