4.8 Article

Characterization of environmental isolates of Enterococcus spp. by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 4-5, Pages 931-940

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.09.005

Keywords

Enterococcus; MALDI-TOF-MS; bacterial source tracking (BST); bacterial fingerprinting; indicator microorganism; fecal pollution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently available bacterial source-tracking tools are often technically demanding, time consuming, and have limited accuracy in grouping isolates according to their respective sources. There is a need for the development of bacterial source-tracking tools that would allow for more rapid and accurate grouping of isolates by source. We examined the use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALIDI-TOF-MS) for the characterization of environmental isolates of Enterococcus. Our main objectives were to develop sample preparation protocols for obtaining reproducible MALDI-TOF mass spectra from Enterococcus isolates and to evaluate methods of data analysis to maximize repeatability of the method and its ability to group isolates according to their respective sources. Our data showed that treatment of 21 Enterococcus isolates from seven unique sources with lysozyme for 20 h, followed by calculation of similarity coefficients using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, facilitated a repeatability level of 91% as well as grouping by source for isolates obtained from several sources including human waste. Our data suggest that MALDI-TOF-MS-based fingerprinting of environmental isolates of Enterococcus has potential as a rapid and accurate bacterial source tracking (BST) tool, but requires further development, specifically regarding the time requirements needed for pre-treatment of isolates with lysozyme. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available