Four Proposals to Help Improve the Medical Research Literature

Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement

(2015) Gary S. Collins et al.   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials

(2014) Jigisha Patel   BMC Medicine

Along with the privilege of authorship come important responsibilities

(2014) David Moher   BMC Medicine

How should medical science change?

(2014) Sabine Kleinert et al.   LANCET

Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research

(2014) Paul Glasziou et al.   LANCET

Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste

(2014) Malcolm R Macleod et al.   LANCET

Journals unite for reproducibility

(2014)   NATURE

Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility

(2014) Francis S. Collins et al.   NATURE

The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative: innovation through collaboration

(2014) Pamela Tenaerts et al.   NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study

(2014) S. Hopewell et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study

(2014) S. J. Chapman et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Writing a research article that is “fit for purpose”: EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines

(2013) Iveta Simera   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Do Physicians Understand Cancer Screening Statistics? A National Survey of Primary Care Physicians in the United States

(2013) Odette Wegwarth   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

(2013) A.-W. Chan et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals

(2012) Allison Hirst et al.   PLoS One

Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes

(2010) Isabelle Boutron   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Assessing the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Cancer

(2009) Afroditi A. Papathanasiou et al.   ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines

(2009) S Mallett et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

(2008) Kerry Dwan et al.   PLoS One