4.6 Article

Crustal-scale structural architecture, shortening, and exhumation of an active, eroding orogenic wedge (Chugach/St. Elias Range, southern Alaska)

Journal

TECTONICS
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2007TC002168

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Active mountain building associated with the accretion of the Yakutat microplate (YT) in southern Alaska is characterized through the combination of a new balanced cross section and new low-temperature cooling ages. This analysis constrains the amount and timing of shortening, the spatial and temporal trends of exhumation, and the interplay between structural development and exhumation. A fold-and-thrust belt comprising three principal thrust sheets (the Hope Creek, Sullivan, and an offshore thrust sheet from north to south) characterizes the YT internal structure, which has absorbed a minimum of similar to 82 km shortening. Assuming shortening and foreland basin development occurred contemporaneously, the shortening rate across the YT is similar to 13-14 mm/a after 5.6 Ma. Detrital apatite fission track ages, from south to north, are unreset along the southern edge of the Sullivan thrust sheet at the coast, are reset and have ages younger than 6.3 Ma within the thrust belt, and have reset cooling ages of similar to 13 Ma in the North American upper plate. Only the zircon samples from the northern, internal YT are potentially reset. Exhumation rates within the thrust belt vary from 0.3 +/- 0.1 mm/a to 4 +/- 1.8 mm/a. Combining the thermochronometric and structural data indicate that wedge exhumation since similar to 6 Ma is 500 km(2) and that particle trajectories have larger horizontal than vertical components. Whereas exhumation and shortening have been focused on the windward side of the Chugach/St. Elias Range since similar to 6 Ma, the cooling ages do not uniquely distinguish between orographically versus tectonically controlled erosion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available