4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Corrosion testing of diffusion-coated steel in molten salt for concentrated solar power tower systems

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 354, Issue -, Pages 46-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.08.097

Keywords

Ferritic-martensitic steel; Diffusion coating; Molten salt; Concentrated solar power tower plant

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [686008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the course of energy transition the development of sustainable technologies for power generation providing base load supply is of particular importance. In comparison to photovoltaics concentrated solar power (CSP) Systems have great potential to fulfil this requirement by the use of thermal storage systems utilizing molten salt mixtures as heat transfer fluids. For this purpose, molten nitrates are frequently discussed due to their beneficial thermal and physical properties as well as high operation temperatures. In order to protect the piping system from degradation, coatings can be applied on the surface of the employed materials, which are commonly steels or Ni-based alloys. The goal is to achieve cost reduction to ensure an even more competitive position of the CSP technology with respect to other renewable sources on the market. In this study, the corrosion behavior of coated and uncoated ferritic-martensitic steels of type T91 and VM12 in molten salt (mixture of NaNO3 and KNO3) has been investigated under isothermal conditions. The diffusion coatings are based on potentially protective elements such as Al, Si or Cr and were applied on the steels either by pack cementation or slurry deposition. Characterization of the samples was conducted by means of optical microscope and EPMA in order to gain a deeper understanding of the occurring corrosion mechanisms and for the purpose of lifetime analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available