Journal
SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 204, Issue 4, Pages 497-502Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.08.020
Keywords
Organic additives; Electrodeposition; Corrosion; Oxalate; Ethylenediamine; Imidazole
Funding
- CAPES
- CNPq
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Cu(II) ions previously coordinated with typical electroplating organic additives were investigated as an alternative source of metal for plating bath. The coordination complexes were isolated from reaction between CuSO4 and organic additives as ligands (oxalate ion, ethylenediamine or imidazole). Deposits over 1010 steel were successfully obtained from electroplated baths using the complexes without any addition of free additives, at pH = 4.5 (H2SO4/Na2SO4). These deposits showed better morphologies than deposits obtained from CuSO4 solution either in the absence or presence of oxalate ion as additive (40 mmol L-1), at pH = 4.5 (H2SO4/Na2SO4)It is suggestive that the starting metal plating coordinated with additives influences the electrode position processes, providing deposits with corrosion potentials shifted over + 200 mV in 0.5 mol L-1 NaCl (1 mV s(-1)). The resistance against corrosion is sensitive to the type of additive-complex used as precursor. The complex with ethylenediamine presented the best deposit results with the lowest pitting potential (-0.27 V vs 3.0 mol L-1 CE). It was concluded that the addition of free additives to the electrodeposition baths is not necessary when working with previously coordinated additives. Thus, the complexes generated in ex-situ are good alternatives as plating precursors for electrodeposition bath. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available