4.6 Article

Microstratigraphy of a Miocene layered phosphatic pebble from the western margin of South Africa

Journal

SEDIMENTOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 666-678

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01355.x

Keywords

Continental shelf; hardground; Miocene; phosphorite; sea-level; Sr isotopes

Categories

Funding

  1. South African National Research Foundation
  2. University of Cape Town

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detailed microstratigraphy and geochemistry of a single-layered phosphatic pebble from the Southern Rocky Plateau at the Head of the Cape Canyon on the western margin of South Africa are utilized to reveal a complex interplay between deposition, erosion and authigenesis in the Miocene. The phosphatic pebble has three micrite and carbonate fluorapatite cemented layers separated by Fe-rich hardground surfaces. The layers contain a diverse grain assemblage of reworked glauconite, phosphorite, detrital quartz and biogenic carbonate. Overlapping Sr-isotope derived ages of point-drilled samples from the three layers range from 19 center dot 1 to 17 center dot 6Ma, although a single point near the outer edge of the uppermost layer has a Sr age of 12 center dot 8 to 10 center dot 4Ma, and a reworked bivalve shell fragment from the middle layer has a Sr age of 26 center dot 3 to 24 center dot 6Ma. The microstratigraphy of the phosphatic pebble provides evidence of multiple Baturin cycles, where periods of deposition and carbonate fluorapatite authigenesis are followed by reworking, erosion and precipitation of iron oxide hardground surfaces. The condensed microstratigraphy of the pebble is consistent with the regional depositional history of the area and indicates significant fluctuations in the depositional environment related to changes in sea-level, sediment supply and upwelling along the western margin of southern Africa during the early to middle Miocene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available