Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices
Authors
Keywords
Harmonic counting, Co-authorship, Citations, Harmonic <em class=EmphasisTypeItalic >h</em>-index, Harmonic <em class=EmphasisTypeItalic >R</em>-index, Questionnaire survey
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 277-295
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-01-02
DOI
10.1007/s11192-012-0905-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Editorial: Location, location, location - the position of authors in scholarly publishing
- (2012) Michelle Cleary et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
- Commentary: Too many authors, too few creators
- (2012) Philip J. Wyatt PHYSICS TODAY
- Equal contributions and credit given to authors in critical care medicine journals during a 10-yr period*
- (2011) Fei Wang et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines
- (2011) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies
- (2011) Elise Smith et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship
- (2011) Ash Mohammad Abbas SCIENTOMETRICS
- Credit where credit’s due: accounting for co-authorship in citation counts
- (2011) Richard S. J. Tol SCIENTOMETRICS
- Fairly sharing the credit of multi-authored papers and its application in the modification of h-index and g-index
- (2011) Xuan Zhen Liu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Equal contributions and credit given to authors in anesthesiology journals during a 10-year period
- (2011) Tianzhu Tao et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Tailor based allocations for multiple authorship: a fractional gh-index
- (2011) Serge Galam SCIENTOMETRICS
- Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective
- (2011) Rodrigo Costas et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods
- (2011) Dag W. Aksnes et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Significance of Authorship Position: An Open-Ended International Assessment
- (2010) Ariella Zbar et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES
- “Equal” Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship
- (2010) Ehimare Akhabue et al. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Metrics: Do metrics matter?
- (2010) Alison Abbott et al. NATURE
- The fractional and harmonic p-indices for multiple authorship
- (2010) Gangan Prathap SCIENTOMETRICS
- Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position
- (2010) Pauline Mattsson et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Deconstructing doctoral dissertations: how many papers does it take to make a PhD?
- (2010) Nils T. Hagen SCIENTOMETRICS
- An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship
- (2010) J. E. Hirsch SCIENTOMETRICS
- Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment
- (2010) Robin L Walker et al. BMC Medical Education
- Psychiatry and the Hirsch h-index: The Relationship Between Journal Impact Factors and Accrued Citations
- (2010) Glenn E. Hunt et al. HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY
- Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations
- (2010) Loet Leydesdorff et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Authorship and Bylines
- (2009) M. Castillo AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
- A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank
- (2009) Chun-Ting Zhang EMBO REPORTS
- “But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first”
- (2009) Bengt Fadeel FASEB JOURNAL
- In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices
- (2009) Xiaojun Hu et al. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE
- Loads of special authorship functions: Linear growth in the percentage of “equal first authors” and corresponding authors
- (2009) Xiaojun Hu JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A case study of the modified Hirsch indexhmaccounting for multiple coauthors
- (2009) Michael Schreiber JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Recognition, reward and responsibility: Why the authorship of scientific papers matters
- (2009) Elizabeth Wager MATURITAS
- Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably – not equally, geometrically or arithmetically
- (2009) Nils T. Hagen SCIENTOMETRICS
- Towards objectivity in research evaluation using bibliometric indicators – A protocol for incorporating complexity
- (2008) Vroni Retzer et al. BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
- Fostering trust—J Mol Med’s scientific integrity policy
- (2008) Detlev Ganten et al. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
- Mathematical theory of the h‐ and g‐index in case of fractional counting of authorship
- (2008) Leo Egghe JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than theh index? A comparison of nine different variants of theh index using data from biomedicine
- (2008) Lutz Bornmann et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts
- (2008) Michael Schreiber NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now