4.6 Article

Molecularly imprinted solid phase extraction coupled to high performance liquid chromatography for determination of aflatoxin M1 and B1 in foods and feeds

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 5, Issue 27, Pages 20951-20960

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra16784h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Innovation Project of Guangdong provincial education department [2012kjcx0104, 2013kjcx0194]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Zhaoqing City, Guangdong province [2013C019]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2012040007710]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A molecularly imprinted polymer was synthesized by a miniemulsion polymerization method using aflatoxin B-1 as the molecular template, methacrylic acid (MAA) as the functional monomer, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as the cross-linker, Span80 and hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide as the surfactants and n-hexadecane as the hydrophobic reagent in the presence of water. This imprinted polymer was characterized by FT-IR, H-1 NMR, scanning electron microscopy, laser light scattering and adsorption experiments, in which the results showed good recognition and selectivity to aflatoxin B-1 and M-1. Using the prepared polymer as a solid phase extraction sorbent, a highly selective sample pretreatment method combined with high performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection was developed for determination of aflatoxin B-1 and M-1 in foods and feeds. The limit of detection and limit of quantification of this method for aflatoxins M-1 and B-1 were 0.05 mu g kg(-1) and 0.16 mu g kg(-1), respectively. The average recovery values from barley, peanut oil, feed and beer spiked samples ranged from 83% to 96%. The precision ranged from 2.2% to 5.6% for these samples. The proposed method was found to be more effective and economical as a pre-treatment technique than regulation 2006/40/EC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available