4.8 Review

Perspectives of carbon nanotubes/polymer nanocomposites for wind blade materials

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 30, Issue -, Pages 651-660

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.008

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes; Polymer nanocomposites; Wind blades; Multi-functional properties; Fatigue; Damage analysis

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [RCPY201103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51203180]
  3. 1000-Talent Program (Recruitment Program of Global Expert, In Chinese: QianRenJiHua)
  4. Program for Attracting High-level Talents of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The global market for wind energy has increased exponentially in the past few decades, and there is a continuous effort to develop cost-effective materials with higher strength to mass ratio for wind blades. With unique structural and transport properties, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted much interest as the reinforcement to develop polymer-based nanocomposites delivering exceptional mechanical properties and multi-functional characteristics. In light of previous and current status in carbon-based materials, herein the suitabilities of CNT/polymer nanocomposites for wind blade materials are analyzed. Special emphasis is placed on the mechanical, fatigue, electrical, thermal and barrier properties of CNT/polymer nanocomposites, which are important considerations when selecting suitable materials for wind blades with larger rotary radius. The application of CNT/polymer nanocomposites as sensory materials for the monitoring of defects in composite structures is also discussed. Finally, based on the progress made so far, some suggestions paving the way for the large commercialization of these nanocomposites for wind blades are presented. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available