4.8 Review

A critical review of factors affecting the wind power generation industry in China

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages 499-508

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.066

Keywords

China; Wind power; Renewable energy; Power generation industry; Sustainable development; Influencing factors

Funding

  1. Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Fund the Ministry of Education of China [12YJAZH205]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China [G2012502065]
  3. Beijing Philosophy and Social Science Planning [12JGB067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

China is facing a number of challenges such as electricity supply shortages, excessive consumption of fossil fuels and environmental pollution. As a renewable energy, wind power plays a vital role in mitigating these issues. With its unique geographical location and rich resources, China has produced a wind power industry that has achieved rapid growth. However, the complex Chinese market environment presents significant challenges to the industry. This research has adopted a strength, weakness, opportunity and threat analysis approach to examine both the internal and external factors that affect the competitiveness of the wind power industry in China. An extensive and critical review of a wide range of literature (including academic papers, industry reports, statistical data, relevant regulations and policy documents) was conducted. As a result, 19 factors were identified. These factors form part of an integrated framework that provides a useful tool for both policy makers and industry to gain a better understanding of what affects the sustainable development of the wind power industry in China. The results also provide a useful reference for foreign firms that intend to explore the Chinese wind power market. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available