Prostate Cancer: Can Multiparametric MR Imaging Help Identify Patients Who Are Candidates for Active Surveillance?

Cancer statistics, 2012

(2012) Rebecca Siegel et al.   CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS

ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012

(2012) Jelle O. Barentsz et al.   EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY

Preoperative nomograms incorporating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer

(2011) Amita Shukla-Dave et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

Pathological stage distribution in patients treated with radical prostatectomy reflecting the need for protocol-based active surveillance: results from a contemporary European patient cohort

(2011) Daniel Seiler et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

Global cancer statistics

(2011) Ahmedin Jemal et al.   CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS

Reverse stage shift at a tertiary care center

(2011) Jonathan L. Silberstein et al.   CANCER

Pathological Outcomes of Men Eligible for Active Surveillance After Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: Are Results Predictable?

(2011) Turang Ed Behbahani et al.   Clinical Genitourinary Cancer

Active Surveillance Program for Prostate Cancer: An Update of the Johns Hopkins Experience

(2011) Jeffrey J. Tosoian et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Delay of Surgery in Men With Low Risk Prostate Cancer

(2011) Daniel O'Brien et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Multiparametric 3T Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Cancer: Histopathological Correlation Using Prostatectomy Specimens Processed in Customized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Molds

(2011) Baris Turkbey et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Endorectal T2-weighted MRI does not differentiate between favorable and adverse pathologic features in men with prostate cancer who would qualify for active surveillance

(2011) Thomas J. Guzzo et al.   UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS

Prostate Cancer: Value of Multiparametric MR Imaging at 3 T for Detection—Histopathologifc Correlation

(2010) Baris Turkbey et al.   RADIOLOGY

Testing the most stringent criteria for selection of candidates for active surveillance in patients with low-risk prostate cancer

(2009) Nazareno Suardi et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

Insignificant Prostate Cancer and Active Surveillance: From Definition to Clinical Implications

(2009) Patrick J. Bastian et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

The Epstein Criteria Predict for Organ-Confined But Not Insignificant Disease and a High Likelihood of Cure at Radical Prostatectomy

(2009) Michael C. Lee et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Validation of Epstein criteria of insignificant prostate cancer in Middle East patients

(2009) Ihab A. Hekal et al.   INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY

Radical Prostatectomy Findings in Patients in Whom Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer Fails

(2009) Amy S. Duffield et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Pathological Findings and Prostate Specific Antigen Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy in Men Eligible for Active Surveillance—Does the Risk of Misclassification Vary According to Biopsy Criteria?

(2009) Guillaume Ploussard et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study

(2009) Fritz H. Schröder et al.   NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer

(2008) Nazareno Suardi et al.   CANCER

Outcomes of Men with Screen-Detected Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance Who Were Managed Expectantly

(2008) Roderick C.N. van den Bergh et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY