Testing the most stringent criteria for selection of candidates for active surveillance in patients with low-risk prostate cancer

Gleason score 7 screen-detected prostate cancers initially managed expectantly: outcomes in 50 men

(2009) Roderick C.N. van den Bergh et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

The probability of Gleason score upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy can be accurately predicted

(2009) Umberto Capitanio et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Cancer Statistics, 2008

(2008) A. Jemal et al.   CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS

Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer

(2008) Nazareno Suardi et al.   CANCER

Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort

(2008) Marc A. Dall'Era et al.   CANCER

Predicting the Probability of Deferred Radical Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer Managed by Active Surveillance

(2008) Nicholas J. van As et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Outcomes of Men with Screen-Detected Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance Who Were Managed Expectantly

(2008) Roderick C.N. van den Bergh et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Surveillance and Deferred Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer. Population Based Study in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden

(2008) Pär Stattin et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Outcomes Following Active Surveillance of Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed in the Prostate Specific Antigen Era

(2008) Barbara Ercole et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

What Percentage of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Carcinoma of the Prostate are Candidates for Surveillance? An Analysis of the CaPSURE™ Database

(2008) Daniel A. Barocas et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Pathological Upgrading and Up Staging With Immediate Repeat Biopsy in Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance

(2008) Ryan K. Berglund et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY