Individual patient monitoring in daily clinical practice: a critical evaluation of minimal important change
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Individual patient monitoring in daily clinical practice: a critical evaluation of minimal important change
Authors
Keywords
Personalized care, Outcome assessment, Psychometrics, Clinimetrics, Satisfaction, Rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 607-616
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2014-09-24
DOI
10.1007/s11136-014-0809-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Clinically important changes in individual and composite measures of rheumatoid arthritis activity: thresholds applicable in clinical trials
- (2014) Michael M Ward et al. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
- Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the functional assessment of cancer therapy: Cognitive function (FACT-Cog) in breast cancer patients
- (2014) Yin Ting Cheung et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The minimal clinically important difference determined using item response theory models: an attempt to solve the issue of the association with baseline score
- (2014) Alexandra Rouquette et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Patients' ratings of global perceived change during 2 years were strongly influenced by the current health status
- (2014) Lars Grøvle et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Dependence of the minimal clinically important improvement on the baseline value is a consequence of floor and ceiling effects and not different expectations by patients
- (2014) Michael M. Ward et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively
- (2013) Aksel Paulsen et al. Acta Orthopaedica
- EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update
- (2013) Josef S Smolen et al. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
- Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease
- (2013) Lars G Johnsen et al. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
- What is a clinically relevant change on the HIT-6 questionnaire? An estimation in a primary-care population of migraine patients
- (2013) Antonia FH Smelt et al. CEPHALALGIA
- The Otitis Media-6 questionnaire: psychometric properties with emphasis on factor structure and interpretability
- (2013) Christian Heidemann et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Does Clinically Important Change in Function After Knee Replacement Guarantee Good Absolute Function? The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study
- (2013) J. L. Maxwell et al. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
- Sufficiently Important Difference
- (2013) Bruce Barrett MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- P34 The minimal clinically important difference of the COPD assessment test
- (2013) SSC Kon et al. THORAX
- Discrepancies between patients and physicians in their perceptions of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity
- (2012) Paul Studenic et al. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
- Detecting relevant changes and responsiveness of Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index
- (2012) Wim Jorritsma et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures
- (2012) K. W. Wyrwich et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures: American College of Rheumatology recommendations for use in clinical practice
- (2012) Jaclyn Anderson et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
- Defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores for patient-reported outcomes: the example of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID)
- (2012) Maxime Dougados et al. ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
- Mathematical coupling does not account for the association between baseline severity and minimally important change values
- (2011) Berend Terluin JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain
- (2011) Manuela L. Ferreira et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- People with low back pain typically need to feel ‘much better’ to consider intervention worthwhile: an observational study
- (2011) Manuela Loureiro Ferreira et al. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY
- It's Good to Feel Better But It's Better To Feel Good and Even Better to Feel Good as Soon as Possible for as Long as Possible. Response Criteria and the Importance of Change at OMERACT 10
- (2011) V. STRAND et al. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
- Baseline Dependency of Minimal Clinically Important Improvement
- (2011) Ying-Chih Wang et al. PHYSICAL THERAPY
- The king’s foot of patient-reported outcomes: current practices and new developments for the measurement of change
- (2011) Richard J. Swartz et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Minimal (clinically) important differences for the Fatigue Assessment Scale in sarcoidosis
- (2011) Willemien P.E. de Kleijn et al. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
- Evaluation of Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire: responsiveness of a new patient-reported outcome measure
- (2011) J. C. Packham et al. RHEUMATOLOGY
- Rheumatoid arthritis patients and rheumatologists approach the decision to escalate care differently: Results of a maximum difference scaling experiment
- (2011) L. T. C. van Hulst et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
- Measures of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: Patient (PtGA) and Provider (PrGA) Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Disease Activity Score (DAS) and Disease Activity Score With 28-Joint Counts (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Cl
- (2011) Jaclyn K. Anderson et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
- Determinants of discordance in patients' and physicians' rating of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity
- (2011) Nasim A. Khan et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
- Updating the Minimal Important Difference for Six-Minute Walk Distance in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- (2010) Anne E. Holland et al. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
- Mathematical coupling may account for the association between baseline severity and minimally important difference values
- (2010) John Patrick Browne et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status
- (2010) Steven J. Kamper et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Patient perspective of measuring treatment efficacy: The rheumatoid arthritis patient priorities for pharmacologic interventions outcomes
- (2010) T. Sanderson et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
- Factors that influence rheumatologists' decisions to escalate care in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a choice-based conjoint analysis
- (2010) Wietske Kievit et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
- What outcomes from pharmacologic treatments are important to people with rheumatoid arthritis? Creating the basis of a patient core set
- (2010) T. Sanderson et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
- Patient preferences and satisfaction in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic therapy
- (2010) Jennifer Barton Patient Preference and Adherence
- Perception of improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis varies with disease activity levels at baseline
- (2009) D. Aletaha et al. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
- Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods
- (2009) Caroline B. Terwee et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied “minimally important change” values
- (2009) Henrica C.W. de Vet et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Identification of Cutpoints for Acceptable Health Status and Important Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes, in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis
- (2009) M. K. KVAMME et al. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
- The Minimally Important Difference for the Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Practice Is Smaller Than in Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2009) J. E. POPE et al. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
- Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
- (2007) Dennis Revicki et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now