Individual patient monitoring in daily clinical practice: a critical evaluation of minimal important change

Clinically important changes in individual and composite measures of rheumatoid arthritis activity: thresholds applicable in clinical trials

(2014) Michael M Ward et al.   ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the functional assessment of cancer therapy: Cognitive function (FACT-Cog) in breast cancer patients

(2014) Yin Ting Cheung et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

The minimal clinically important difference determined using item response theory models: an attempt to solve the issue of the association with baseline score

(2014) Alexandra Rouquette et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Patients' ratings of global perceived change during 2 years were strongly influenced by the current health status

(2014) Lars Grøvle et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Dependence of the minimal clinically important improvement on the baseline value is a consequence of floor and ceiling effects and not different expectations by patients

(2014) Michael M. Ward et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively

(2013) Aksel Paulsen et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update

(2013) Josef S Smolen et al.   ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease

(2013) Lars G Johnsen et al.   BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS

What is a clinically relevant change on the HIT-6 questionnaire? An estimation in a primary-care population of migraine patients

(2013) Antonia FH Smelt et al.   CEPHALALGIA

The Otitis Media-6 questionnaire: psychometric properties with emphasis on factor structure and interpretability

(2013) Christian Heidemann et al.   Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Does Clinically Important Change in Function After Knee Replacement Guarantee Good Absolute Function? The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

(2013) J. L. Maxwell et al.   JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Sufficiently Important Difference

(2013) Bruce Barrett   MEDICAL DECISION MAKING

P34 The minimal clinically important difference of the COPD assessment test

(2013) SSC Kon et al.   THORAX

Discrepancies between patients and physicians in their perceptions of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity

(2012) Paul Studenic et al.   ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM

Detecting relevant changes and responsiveness of Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index

(2012) Wim Jorritsma et al.   EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL

“Feeling better” or “feeling well” in usual care of hip and knee osteoarthritis pain: Determination of cutoff points for patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) at rest and on movement in a national multicenter cohort study of 2414 patients with painful osteoarthritis

(2012) Serge Perrot et al.   PAIN

Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures

(2012) K. W. Wyrwich et al.   QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures: American College of Rheumatology recommendations for use in clinical practice

(2012) Jaclyn Anderson et al.   ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH

Defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores for patient-reported outcomes: the example of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID)

(2012) Maxime Dougados et al.   ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY

Mathematical coupling does not account for the association between baseline severity and minimally important change values

(2011) Berend Terluin   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain

(2011) Manuela L. Ferreira et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

People with low back pain typically need to feel ‘much better’ to consider intervention worthwhile: an observational study

(2011) Manuela Loureiro Ferreira et al.   AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY

It's Good to Feel Better But It's Better To Feel Good and Even Better to Feel Good as Soon as Possible for as Long as Possible. Response Criteria and the Importance of Change at OMERACT 10

(2011) V. STRAND et al.   JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Baseline Dependency of Minimal Clinically Important Improvement

(2011) Ying-Chih Wang et al.   PHYSICAL THERAPY

The king’s foot of patient-reported outcomes: current practices and new developments for the measurement of change

(2011) Richard J. Swartz et al.   QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Minimal (clinically) important differences for the Fatigue Assessment Scale in sarcoidosis

(2011) Willemien P.E. de Kleijn et al.   RESPIRATORY MEDICINE

Evaluation of Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire: responsiveness of a new patient-reported outcome measure

(2011) J. C. Packham et al.   RHEUMATOLOGY

Rheumatoid arthritis patients and rheumatologists approach the decision to escalate care differently: Results of a maximum difference scaling experiment

(2011) L. T. C. van Hulst et al.   ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH

Measures of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: Patient (PtGA) and Provider (PrGA) Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Disease Activity Score (DAS) and Disease Activity Score With 28-Joint Counts (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Cl

(2011) Jaclyn K. Anderson et al.   ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH

Determinants of discordance in patients' and physicians' rating of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity

(2011) Nasim A. Khan et al.   ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH

Updating the Minimal Important Difference for Six-Minute Walk Distance in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

(2010) Anne E. Holland et al.   ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION

Mathematical coupling may account for the association between baseline severity and minimally important difference values

(2010) John Patrick Browne et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status

(2010) Steven J. Kamper et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Patient perspective of measuring treatment efficacy: The rheumatoid arthritis patient priorities for pharmacologic interventions outcomes

(2010) T. Sanderson et al.   ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH

Factors that influence rheumatologists' decisions to escalate care in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a choice-based conjoint analysis

(2010) Wietske Kievit et al.   ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH

What outcomes from pharmacologic treatments are important to people with rheumatoid arthritis? Creating the basis of a patient core set

(2010) T. Sanderson et al.   ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH

Patient preferences and satisfaction in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic therapy

(2010) Jennifer Barton   Patient Preference and Adherence

Perception of improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis varies with disease activity levels at baseline

(2009) D. Aletaha et al.   ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM

Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods

(2009) Caroline B. Terwee et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied “minimally important change” values

(2009) Henrica C.W. de Vet et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Identification of Cutpoints for Acceptable Health Status and Important Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes, in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis

(2009) M. K. KVAMME et al.   JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY

The Minimally Important Difference for the Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Practice Is Smaller Than in Randomized Controlled Trials

(2009) J. E. POPE et al.   JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes

(2007) Dennis Revicki et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY