Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes
Authors
Keywords
Meta-analysis, Publication ethics, Normal distribution, Systematic reviews, Random variables, Research errors, Epidemiological statistics, Simulation and modeling
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages e0204056
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2018-09-14
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0204056
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis
- (2018) Lifeng Lin et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Multistep estimators of the between-study variance: The relationship with the Paule-Mandel estimator
- (2018) Robbie C. M. van Aert et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A comparison of seven random-effects models for meta-analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio
- (2018) Dan Jackson et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
- (2018) Jessica Gurevitch et al. NATURE
- Practical challenges of I 2 as a measure of heterogeneity
- (2017) David C. Hoaglin Research Synthesis Methods
- Alternative measures of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Reducing the impact of outlying studies
- (2016) Lifeng Lin et al. BIOMETRICS
- Misunderstandings aboutQand ‘Cochran'sQtest' in meta-analysis
- (2015) David C. Hoaglin STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis
- (2015) Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Meta-analysis as Evidence
- (2014) Jesse A. Berlin et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis
- (2011) Jonathan Davey et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: Methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk
- (2010) Haitao Chu et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Meta-analysis for rare events
- (2010) Tianxi Cai et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data
- (2010) Theo Stijnen et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
- (2010) Michael Borenstein et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?
- (2009) Dan Jackson et al. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE
- Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis
- (2009) Jonathan J. Shuster STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta-analysis with zero cells
- (2008) Gerta Rücker et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots
- (2008) John P A Ioannidis et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Recent developments in meta-analysis
- (2007) Alexander J. Sutton et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now