Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section targeted at organisations, facilities and systems: Systematic review of qualitative studies
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section targeted at organisations, facilities and systems: Systematic review of qualitative studies
Authors
Keywords
Midwives, Labor and delivery, Birth, Hospitals, Health care policy, Medical doctors, Culture, Finance
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages e0203274
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2018-09-05
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0203274
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table
- (2018) Simon Lewin et al. Implementation Science
- Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries
- (2018) Adeline Adwoa Boatin et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries
- (2018) Adeline Adwoa Boatin et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care
- (2017) Adam G Elshaug et al. LANCET
- Perspectives on Promoting Hospital Primary Vaginal Birth: A Qualitative Study
- (2016) Holly P. Kennedy et al. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE
- Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide
- (2016) Suellen Miller et al. LANCET
- Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile
- (2016) Lorena Binfa et al. MIDWIFERY
- DECIDE: a cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce non-medically indicated caesareans in Burkina Faso
- (2016) Charles Kaboré et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- The costs of ‘free’: Experiences of facility-based childbirth after Benin's caesarean section exemption policy
- (2016) Isabelle L. Lange et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- “It's Like a Disease”: Women's perceptions of caesarean sections in Ghana's Upper West Region
- (2016) Andrea Rishworth et al. Women and Birth
- The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014
- (2016) Ana Pilar Betrán et al. PLoS One
- Evaluating the ‘Focus on Normal Birth and Reducing Caesarean section Rates Rapid Improvement Programme’: A mixed method study in England
- (2015) Joyce L. Marshall et al. MIDWIFERY
- Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review
- (2015) Ingela Lundgren et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)
- (2015) Simon Lewin et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Evaluation of quality improvement for cesarean sections programmes through mixed methods
- (2014) Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo et al. Implementation Science
- A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It
- (2014) Ana Pilar Betrán et al. PLoS One
- Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Santiago, Chile
- (2013) Lorena Binfa et al. MIDWIFERY
- Elective caesarean delivery: A mixed method qualitative investigation
- (2013) Holly Powell Kennedy et al. MIDWIFERY
- Empowering change: Realist evaluation of a Scottish Government programme to support normal birth
- (2013) Helen Cheyne et al. MIDWIFERY
- Impact of alternative reimbursement strategies in the new cooperative medical scheme on caesarean delivery rates: a mixed-method study in rural China
- (2012) Kun Huang et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health
- (2012) JP Souza et al. BMC Medicine
- Cesarean section rate in Iran, multidimensional approaches for behavioral change of providers: a qualitative study
- (2011) Bahareh Yazdizadeh et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Non-clinical interventions that increase the uptake and success of vaginal birth after caesarean section: a systematic review
- (2011) Christine Catling-Paull et al. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
- Using a Clinical Pathway to Support Normal Birth: Impact on Practitioner Roles and Working Practices
- (2010) Billie Hunter et al. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE
- Vouchers as demand side financing instruments for health care: A review of the Bangladesh maternal voucher scheme
- (2010) Jean-Olivier Schmidt et al. HEALTH POLICY
- Implementing a National Policy Initiative to Support Normal Birth: Lessons From the All Wales Clinical Pathway for Normal Labour
- (2010) Billie Hunter JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH
- Normalizing Birth in England: A Qualitative Study
- (2010) Holly Powell Kennedy et al. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH
- Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08
- (2010) Pisake Lumbiganon et al. LANCET
- Facilitators and barriers in the humanization of childbirth practice in Japan
- (2010) Roxana Behruzi et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started