A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It
Authors
Keywords
Systematic reviews, Pregnancy, Database searching, Birth, Data management, Labor and delivery, Obstetrics and gynecology, Womens health
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages e97769
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2014-06-04
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0097769
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It
- (2014) Ana Pilar Betrán et al. PLoS One
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson’s ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables
- (2013) Paola Colais et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: a panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania
- (2013) Helena Litorp et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Classification of cesarean sections among immigrants in Belgium
- (2012) ANNE-FREDERIQUE MINSART et al. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
- Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital
- (2012) CHERYL CHONG et al. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
- 642: The contribution of patient age to the Robson cesarean section classification
- (2012) Amos Grunebaum et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- 802: CUT study: cesarean deliveries in United States using ten group classification
- (2012) Karen Flood et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate
- (2012) Michael Robson et al. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
- Comparative analysis of cesarean delivery rates over a 10-year period in a single Institution using 10-class classification
- (2012) Elena Ciriello et al. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Limiting the caesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: an observational study
- (2012) Ilse Delbaere et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- The Singleton, Cephalic, Nulliparous Woman After 36 Weeks of Gestation
- (2011) Donal J. Brennan et al. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review
- (2011) Maria Regina Torloni et al. PLoS One
- Caesarean section among referred and self-referred birthing women: a cohort study from a tertiary hospital, northeastern Tanzania
- (2011) Ingvil K Sørbye et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: A population-based study
- (2011) Efty P Stavrou et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States
- (2010) Jun Zhang et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Medical audit using the Ten Group Classification System and its impact on the cesarean section rate
- (2010) Anibal Scarella et al. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08
- (2010) Pisake Lumbiganon et al. LANCET
- A novel use of a classification system to audit severe maternal morbidity
- (2010) Caroline S.E. Homer et al. MIDWIFERY
- Using a Caesarean Section Classification System based on characteristics of the population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice
- (2010) Maria L Costa et al. Reproductive Health
- Nulliparous term singleton vertex caesarean delivery rates
- (2009) Donal J. Brennan et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor
- (2009) Donal J. Brennan et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- P140 Cesarean section in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: experience from a Brazilian university hospital
- (2009) A. Zamarian et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
- WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections
- (2009) Ana P Betrán et al. Reproductive Health
- Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
- (2008) James Thomas et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started