Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons
Published 2012 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2012-09-12
DOI
10.1186/1471-2288-12-138
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Directed acyclic graphs can help understand bias in indirect and mixed treatment comparisons
- (2012) Jeroen P. Jansen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Estimating the Power of Indirect Comparisons: A Simulation Study
- (2011) Edward J. Mills et al. PLoS One
- An informed reference prior for between-study heterogeneity in meta-analyses of binary outcomes
- (2011) Eleanor M. Pullenayegum STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Consistency between Direct and Indirect Trial Evidence: Is Direct Evidence Always More Reliable?
- (2011) Jason Madan et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1
- (2011) Jeroen P. Jansen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
- (2010) Simon Thompson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality
- (2010) Sarah Donegan et al. PLoS One
- Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
- (2010) S. Dias et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials
- (2009) S. J. Edwards et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Indirect comparison: relative risk fallacies and odds solution
- (2009) Simon Eckermann et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered
- (2009) Georgia Salanti et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Addressing between-study heterogeneity and inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons: Application to stroke prevention treatments in individuals with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation
- (2009) Nicola J. Cooper et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Direct versus indirect comparisons: A summary of the evidence
- (2008) Gerald Gartlehner et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Models for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors
- (2008) N. J. Welton et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Bias modelling in evidence synthesis
- (2008) Rebecca M. Turner et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
- (2008) Lesley Wood et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions
- (2007) F. Song et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation