4.5 Article

Production of Hydrogen-Rich Syngas from Biogas Reforming with Partial Oxidation Using a Multi-Stage AC Gliding Arc System

Journal

PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 583-596

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11090-012-9366-z

Keywords

Syngas; Biogas reforming; Partial oxidation; Gliding arc discharge; Plasma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this research work was to evaluate the possibility of upgrading the simulated biogas (70 % CH4 and 30 % CO2) for hydrogen-rich syngas production using a multi-stage AC gliding arc system. The results showed that increasing stage number of plasma reactors, applied voltage and electrode gap distance enhanced both CH4 and CO2 conversions, in contrast with the increases in feed flow rate and input frequency. The gaseous products were mainly H-2 and CO, with small amounts of C2H2, C2H4 and C2H6. The optimum conditions for hydrogen-rich syngas production using the four-stage AC gliding arc system were a feed flow rate of 150 cm(3)/min, an input frequency of 300 Hz, an applied voltage of 17 kV and an electrode gap distance of 6 mm. At the minimum power consumption (3.3 x 10(-18) W s/molecule of biogas converted and 2.8 x 10(-18) W s/molecule of syngas produced), CH4 and CO2 conversions were 21.5 and 5.7 %, respectively, H-2 and CO selectivities were 57.1 and 14.9 %, respectively, and H-2/CO (hydrogen-rich syngas) was 6.9. The combination of the plasma reforming and partial oxidation provided remarkable improvements to the overall process performance, especially in terms of reducing both the power consumption and the carbon formation on the electrode surface but the produced syngas had a much lower H-2/CO ratio, depending on the oxygen/methane feed molar ratio. The best feed molar ratio of O-2-to-CH4 ratio was found to be 0.3/1, providing the CH4 conversion of 81.4 %, CO2 conversion of 49.3 %, O-2 conversion of 92.4 %, H-2 selectivity of 49.5 %, CO selectivity of 49.96 %, and H-2/CO of 1.6.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available