Complementarity of weak lensing and peculiar velocity measurements in testing general relativity
Published 2011 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Complementarity of weak lensing and peculiar velocity measurements in testing general relativity
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 84, Issue 8, Pages -
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Online
2011-10-22
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.84.083523
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- SEVEN-YEARWILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
- (2011) E. Komatsu et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
- Measuring coherent motions in the universe
- (2011) Yong-Seon Song et al. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
- Coherent combination of baryon acoustic oscillation statistics and peculiar velocity measurements from redshift surveys
- (2011) Yong-Seon Song PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Cosmological tests of gravity
- (2010) Bhuvnesh Jain et al. ANNALS OF PHYSICS
- SPECTRA ANDHUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPELIGHT CURVES OF SIX TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE AT 0.511
- (2010) R. Amanullah et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- Theoretical priors on modified growth parametrisations
- (2010) Yong-Seon Song et al. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
- Decomposition of spectra from redshift distortion maps
- (2010) Yong-Seon Song et al. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
- Weak lensing predictions for modified gravities at non-linear scales
- (2010) Emma Beynon et al. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
- Probing modifications of general relativity using current cosmological observations
- (2010) Gong-Bo Zhao et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- How to optimally parametrize deviations from general relativity in the evolution of cosmological perturbations
- (2010) Levon Pogosian et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Confronting general relativity with further cosmological data
- (2010) Scott F. Daniel et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Tests of gravity from imaging and spectroscopic surveys
- (2010) Jacek Guzik et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Testing general relativity with current cosmological data
- (2010) Scott F. Daniel et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Current constraints on the cosmic growth history
- (2010) Rachel Bean et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Dark-energy constraints and correlations with systematics from CFHTLS weak lensing, SNLS supernovae Ia and WMAP5
- (2009) M. Kilbinger et al. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
- A step towards testing general relativity using weak gravitational lensing and redshift surveys
- (2009) Yong-Seon Song et al. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
- Consistency test of general relativity from large scale structure of the universe
- (2009) Yong-Seon Song et al. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
- Investigating dark energy experiments with principal components
- (2009) Robert G Crittenden et al. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
- Forecasting cosmological constraints from redshift surveys
- (2009) Martin White et al. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
- Empirical Hα emitter count predictions for dark energy surveys
- (2009) J. E. Geach et al. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
- Searching for modified growth patterns with tomographic surveys
- (2009) Gong-Bo Zhao et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Cosmological Tests of General Relativity with Future Tomographic Surveys
- (2009) Gong-Bo Zhao et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Measuring the dark side (with weak lensing)
- (2008) Luca Amendola et al. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
- Observational tests of modified gravity
- (2008) Bhuvnesh Jain et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started