4.6 Article

Measuring coherent motions in the universe

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/05/020

Keywords

redshift surveys; cosmological parameters from LSS

Funding

  1. STFC
  2. JSPS
  3. WPI Initiative, MEXT Japan
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [PG036701] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present new measurements of the coherent motion of galaxies based on observations of the large-scale redshift-space distortions seen in the two-dimensional two-point correlation function of Luminous Red Galaxies in Data Release Seven of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We have developed a new methodology for estimating these coherent motions, which is less dependent on the details of galaxy bias and of the cosmological model to explain the late-time acceleration of the expansion of the Universe. We measure a one-dimensional velocity dispersion of galaxies on large-scales of sigma(v) = 3.01(-0.46)(+0.45) h(-1) Mpc and sigma(v) = 3.69(-0.47)(+0.47) h(-1) Mpc at a mean redshift of z = 0.25 and 0.38 respectively. These values are fully consistent with predictions for a WMAP7-normalised ACDM Universe and inconsistent at confidence of 3.8 sigma with a Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) model for the Universe. We can convert the units of these sigma(v) measurements to 270(-41)(+40) km/s and 320(-41)(+41) km/s respectively (assuming, a ACDM universe), which are lower that expected based on recent low redshift (z < 0.2) measurements of the peculiar velocity field (or bulk flows). It is difficult to directly compare,. these measurements as they cover different redshift ranges and different areas of the sky. However, one possible cosmological explanation for this discrepancy is that our Galaxy is located in unusually over, or under, dense region of the Universe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available