4.4 Article

Haloarchaeobius amylolyticus sp nov., isolated from a marine solar saltern

Journal

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 197, Issue 7, Pages 949-953

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-015-1129-9

Keywords

Haloarchaeobius amylolyticus sp nov.; Halophilic archaeon; Marine solar saltern

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31370054]
  2. 11th Six Talents Peak Project of Jiangsu Province [2014-SWYY-021]
  3. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Halophilic archaeal strain XD48(T) was isolated from a Chinese marine solar saltern. Cells were pleomorphic, stained Gram-negative and formed red-pigmented colonies on solid media. Strain XD48(T) was found to be able to grow at 25-50 A degrees C (optimum 37 A degrees C), at 0.9-4.8 M NaCl (optimum 3.1 M NaCl), at 0-1.0 M MgCl2 (optimum 0.3 MgCl2) and at pH 5.0-9.5 (optimum pH 6.5). The cells lysed in distilled water, and the minimal NaCl concentration to prevent cell lysis was found to be 5 % (w/v). The major polar lipids of the strain were phosphatidic acid (PA), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylglycerol phosphate methyl ester (PGP-Me), phosphatidylglycerol sulfate (PGS), sulfated galactosyl mannosyl glucosyl diether (S-TGD-1), sulfated mannosyl glucosyl diether (S-DGD-1) and six unknown glycolipids. The 16S rRNA gene and rpoB' gene of strain XD48(T) were phylogenetically related to the corresponding genes of Haloarchaeobius members (92.4-93.9 and 89.6-90.5 % similarities, respectively). The DNA G + C content of strain XD48(T) was determined to be 65.3 mol%. The phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic properties suggested that strain XD48(T) (=CGMCC 1.12230(T) = JCM 18642(T)) represents a new species of Haloarchaeobius, for which the name Haloarchaeobius amylolyticus sp. nov. is proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available