The h‐index, h‐core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Web of Science database in three configurations
Published 2011 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The h‐index, h‐core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Web of Science database in three configurations
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 821-833
Publisher
Emerald
Online
2011-10-01
DOI
10.1108/14684521111176525
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The h‐index, h‐core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Scopus database
- (2011) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology
- (2010) Miguel A. García-Pérez JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar
- (2010) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Pragmatic issues in calculating and comparing the quantity and quality of research through rating and ranking of researchers based on peer reviews and bibliometric indicators from Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar
- (2010) Péter Jacsò ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Ranking of library and information science researchers: Comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgments
- (2010) Jiang Li et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The h‐index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus
- (2009) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Database source coverage: hypes, vital signs and reality checks
- (2009) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Errors of omission and their implications for computing scientometric measures in evaluating the publishing productivity and impact of countries
- (2009) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Calculating the h‐index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators from Google Scholar with the Publish or Perish software
- (2009) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- The stability of the h-index
- (2009) Monika Henzinger et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Ranking university departments using the mean h-index
- (2009) Themis Lazaridis SCIENTOMETRICS
- A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar
- (2009) Massimo Franceschet SCIENTOMETRICS
- Rankings of information and library science journals by JIF and by h-type indices
- (2009) Judit Bar-Ilan Journal of Informetrics
- Peer review and the h-index: Two studies
- (2009) Michael Norris et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Citation counting, citation ranking, andh-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science
- (2008) Lokman I. Meho et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Web of Science
- (2008) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- The plausibility of computing the h‐index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference‐enhanced databases
- (2008) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Scopus
- (2008) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Google Scholar
- (2008) Pe´ter Jacso´ ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns
- (2008) Jonathan M. Levitt et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started