Pragmatic issues in calculating and comparing the quantity and quality of research through rating and ranking of researchers based on peer reviews and bibliometric indicators from Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar

Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar

(2010) Péter Jacsó   ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW

Ranking of library and information science researchers: Comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgments

(2010) Jiang Li et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies: A tale of two citation databases—Scopus and Web of Science

(2009) Lokman I. Meho et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Citations versus limitations of citations: beyond Hirsch index

(2009) Milan Randić   SCIENTOMETRICS

Peer review and the h-index: Two studies

(2009) Michael Norris et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Revisitingh measured on UK LIS and IR academics

(2008) Mark Sanderson   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than theh index? A comparison of nine different variants of theh index using data from biomedicine

(2008) Lutz Bornmann et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Citation counting, citation ranking, andh-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science

(2008) Lokman I. Meho et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Web of Science

(2008) Péter Jacsó   ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW

The plausibility of computing the h‐index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference‐enhanced databases

(2008) Péter Jacsó   ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW

The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Scopus

(2008) Péter Jacsó   ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW

The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Google Scholar

(2008) Pe´ter Jacso´   ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW