4.7 Article

Chefs' Opinions About Reducing the Calorie Content of Menu Items in Restaurants

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 332-337

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.188

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK039177]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modifying the energy content of foods, particularly foods eaten away from home, is important in addressing the obesity epidemic. Chefs in the restaurant industry are uniquely placed to influence the provision of reduced-calorie foods, but little is known about their opinions on this issue. A survey was conducted among chefs attending US culinary meetings about strategies for creating reduced-calorie foods and opportunities for introducing such items on restaurant menus. The 432 respondents were from a wide variety of employment positions and the majority had been in the restaurant industry for >= 20 years. Nearly all chefs (93%) thought that the calories in menu items could be reduced by 10-25% without customers noticing. To decrease the calories in two specific foods, respondents were more likely to select strategies for reducing energy density than for reducing portion size (P < 0.004). Low consumer demand was identified as the greatest barrier to including reduced-calorie items on the menu by 38% of chefs, followed by the need for staff skills and training (24%), and high ingredient cost (18%). The majority of respondents (71%) ranked taste as the most influential factor in the success of reduced-calorie items (P < 0.0001). The results of this survey indicate that opportunities exist for reducing the energy content of restaurant items. Ongoing collaboration is needed between chefs and public health professionals to ensure that appealing reduced-calorie menu items are more widely available in restaurants and that research is directed toward effective ways to develop and promote these items.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Nutrition & Dietetics

USDA Nutrition Evidence Library: methodology used to identify topics and develop systematic review questions for the birth-to-24-mo population

Julie E. Obbagy, Donna M. Blum-Kemelor, Eve V. Essery, Joan M. G. Lyon, Joanne M. Spahn

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2014)

Article Nutrition & Dietetics

Executive summary: evaluating the evidence base to support the inclusion of infants and children from birth to 24 mo of age in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans - the B-24 Project

Daniel J. Raiten, Ramkripa Raghavan, Alexandra Porter, Julie E. Obbagy, Joanne M. Spahn

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2014)

Review Nutrition & Dietetics

Complementary feeding and food allergy, atopic dermatitis/eczema, asthma, and allergic rhinitis: a systematic review

Julie E. Obbagy, Laural K. English, Yat Ping Wong, Nancy F. Butte, Kathryn G. Dewey, David M. Fleischer, Mary Kay Fox, Frank R. Greer, Nancy F. Krebs, Kelley S. Scanlon, Eve E. Stoody

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2019)

Review Nutrition & Dietetics

Complementary feeding and bone health: a systematic review

Julie E. Obbagy, Laural K. English, Yat Ping Wong, Nancy F. Butte, Kathryn G. Dewey, Mary Kay Fox, Frank R. Greer, Nancy F. Krebs, Kelley S. Scanlon, Eve E. Stoody

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2019)

Review Nutrition & Dietetics

Systematic review methods for the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project

Julie E. Obbagy, Joanne M. Spahn, Yat Ping Wong, Tricia L. Psota, Maureen K. Spill, Carol Dreibelbis, Darcy E. Gungor, Perrine Nadaud, Ramkripa Raghavan, Emily H. Callahan, Laural K. English, Brittany L. Kingshipp, Concetta C. LaPergola, Myra J. Shapiro, Eve E. Stoody

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2019)

Review Nutrition & Dietetics

Complementary feeding and micronutrient status: a systematic review

Julie E. Obbagy, Laural K. English, Tricia L. Psota, Yat Ping Wong, Nancy F. Butte, Kathryn G. Dewey, Mary Kay Fox, Frank R. Greer, Nancy F. Krebs, Kelley S. Scanlon, Eve E. Stoody

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2019)

Review Nutrition & Dietetics

Timing of introduction of complementary foods and beverages and growth, size, and body composition: a systematic review

Laural K. English, Julie E. Obbagy, Yat Ping Wong, Nancy F. Butte, Kathryn G. Dewey, Mary Kay Fox, Frank R. Greer, Nancy F. Krebs, Kelley S. Scanlon, Eve E. Stoody

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2019)

Review Nutrition & Dietetics

Types and amounts of complementary foods and beverages consumed and growth, size, and body composition: a systematic review

Laural K. English, Julie E. Obbagy, Yat Ping Wong, Nancy F. Butte, Kathryn G. Dewey, Mary Kay Fox, Frank R. Greer, Nancy F. Krebs, Kelley S. Scanlon, Eve E. Stoody

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2019)

Review Nutrition & Dietetics

Complementary feeding and developmental milestones: a systematic review

Laural K. English, Julie E. Obbagy, Yat Ping Wong, Nancy F. Butte, Kathryn G. Dewey, Mary Kay Fox, Frank R. Greer, Nancy F. Krebs, Kelley S. Scanlon, Eve E. Stoody

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2019)

Review Nutrition & Dietetics

Breastfeeding and risk of overweight in childhood and beyond: a systematic review with emphasis on sibling-pair and intervention studies

Kathryn G. Dewey, Darcy Gungor, Sharon M. Donovan, Emily M. Madan, Sudha Venkatramanan, Teresa A. Davis, Ronald E. Kleinman, Elsie M. Taveras, Regan L. Bailey, Rachel Novotny, Nancy Terry, Gisela Butera, Julie Obbagy, Janet de Jesus, Eve Stoody

Summary: Breastfeeding is associated with a lower risk of overweight and obesity in children aged 2 years and older, especially if the duration of breastfeeding is more than 6 months. However, further research with strong study designs is needed to confirm the causal relationship and to eliminate potential confounding factors.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2021)

Review Nutrition & Dietetics

Omega-3 Fatty Acid Dietary Supplements Consumed During Pregnancy and Lactation and Child Neurodevelopment: A Systematic Review

Julie E. H. Nevins, Sharon M. Donovan, Linda Snetselaar, Kathryn G. Dewey, Rachel Novotny, Jamie Stang, Elsie M. Taveras, Ronald E. Kleinman, Regan L. Bailey, Ramkripa Raghavan, Sara R. Scinto-Madonich, Sudha Venkatramanan, Gisela Butera, Nancy Terry, Jean Altman, Meghan Adler, Julie E. Obbagy, Eve E. Stoody, Janet de Jesus

Summary: Limited evidence suggests that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation during pregnancy may result in favorable cognitive development in the child. There was insufficient evidence to evaluate the effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation during pregnancy and/or lactation on other developmental outcomes.

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION (2021)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Evaluation of Dietary Patterns and All-Cause Mortality A Systematic Review

Laural K. English, Jamy D. Ard, Regan L. Bailey, Marlana Bates, Lydia A. Bazzano, Carol J. Boushey, Clarissa Brown, Gisela Butera, Emily H. Callahan, Janet de Jesus, Richard D. Mattes, Elizabeth J. Mayer-Davis, Rachel Novotny, Julie E. Obbagy, Elizabeth B. Rahavi, Joan Sabate, Linda G. Snetselaar, Eve E. Stoody, Linda V. Van Horn, Sudha Venkatramanan, Steven B. Heymsfield

Summary: The systematic review conducted by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee found that consuming a nutrient-dense dietary pattern was associated with a reduced risk of death from all causes in adults and older adults. This healthy dietary pattern included higher consumption of vegetables, fruits, nuts, whole grains, unsaturated vegetable oils, fish, and lean meat, while being relatively low in red and processed meat, high-fat dairy, and refined carbohydrates or sweets.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2021)

Article Nutrition & Dietetics

Perspective: USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Methodology: Grading the Strength of Evidence in Nutrition- and Public Health-Related Systematic Reviews

Maureen K. Spill, Laural K. English, Ramkripa Raghavan, Emily Callahan, Darcy Gungor, Brittany Kingshipp, Joanne Spahn, Eve Stoody, Julie Obbagy

Summary: This article describes the methods used by USDA's NESR team to grade the strength of evidence in food- and nutrition-related systematic reviews. The NESR grading process includes assessing evidence against five elements and assigning one of four grades. This rigorous and transparent process ensures that decisions related to nutrition and public health are based on the strongest available evidence.

ADVANCES IN NUTRITION (2022)

Editorial Material Nutrition & Dietetics

Count Every Bite to Make Every Bite Count: Measurement Gaps and Future Directions for Assessing Diet From Birth to 24 Months

Meghan Zimmer, Julie Obbagy, Kelley S. Scanlon, Kimberlea Gibbs, Jennifer L. Lerman, Heather C. Hamner, Tusarebecca Pannucci, Amanda Sharfman, Jill Reedy, Kirsten A. Herrick

JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS (2023)

Meeting Abstract Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Implementing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans Using New Technologies as a Channel for Nutrition Education: Evidence From Research and Best Practices

Donna Michele Blum-Kemelor, Joanne M. Spahn, Julie E. Obbagy, Thomas V. Fungwe, Sara L. Olson, Sarah E. Samuels, Sallie Yoshida, Ted Shen

FASEB JOURNAL (2012)

No Data Available