4.7 Article

Surface characterization, corrosion properties and bioactivity of Ca-doped TiO2 coatings for biomedical applications

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 280, Issue -, Pages 291-300

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.09.018

Keywords

Bioactivity; Corrosion; Doping; Porosity; Sol-gel method; Titania coatings

Funding

  1. University of Lodz [B14 11100000047.01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the preparation and characterization of calcium-doped titanium dioxide coatings for biomedical applications. The coatings were produced on the surface of the biomedical alloy M3ONW by the sot-gel dipcoating technique using two different titanium alkoxide precursors. The effect of calcium ion doping on the topographical and anticorrosion properties, as well as the bioactivity of TiO2 coating was examined. The phase composition, thickness, morphology, topography and roughness of undoped and Ca-doped TiO2 coatings were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray reflectivity (XRR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Corrosion measurements were carried out in PBS solution using electrochemical methods. Anticorrosion properties of TiO2 and Ca/TiO2 coatings were specified based on the determined values for corrosion potential E-cor, polarization resistance R-p, corrosion rate CR, current density in passive range 10.5 and also breakdown E-b and repassivation E-rep, potentials. The porosity of TiO2-based coatings was determined from the measured polarization resistance. The bioactivity of TiO(2)sol-gel coatings was examined with an immersion test in simulated body fluid (SBF) for 4 weeks. The sol-gel procedure used in this study allowed the production of anticorrosive TiO2 coatings. As a result of calcium doping thicker, more porous and bioactive coatings were obtained. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available