4.6 Article

A comparison of the sedimentary records of the 1960 and 2010 great Chilean earthquakes in 17 lakes: Implications for quantitative lacustrine palaeoseismology

Journal

SEDIMENTOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages 1466-1496

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sed.12193

Keywords

Chile; earthquake; lake; landslide; palaeoseismology; turbidite

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
  2. Special Research Fund of Ghent University (BOF)
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I013210/1]
  4. FWO-Vlaanderen
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [133481]
  6. NERC [NE/I013210/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seismically-induced event deposits embedded in the sedimentary infill of lacustrine basins are highly useful for palaeoseismic reconstructions. Recent, well-documented, great megathrust earthquakes provide an ideal opportunity to calibrate seismically-induced event deposits for lakes with different characteristics and located in different settings. This study used 107 short sediment cores to investigate the sedimentary impact of the 1960 M-w 95 Valdivia and the 2010 M-w 88 Maule earthquakes in 17 lakes in South-CentralChile (i.e. lakes Negra, Lo Encanado, Aculeo, Vichuquen, Laja, Villarrica, Calafquen, Pullinque, Pellaifa, Panguipulli, Neltume, Rinihue, Ranco, Maihue, Puyehue, Rupanco and Llanquihue). A combination of image analysis, magnetic susceptibility and grain-size analysis allows identification of five types of seismically-induced event deposits: (i) mass-transport deposits; (ii) in situ deformations; (iii) lacustrine turbidites with a composition similar to the hemipelagic background sediments (lacustrine turbidites type 1); (iv) lacustrine turbidites with a composition different from the background sediments (lacustrine turbidites type 2) and (v) megaturbidites. These seismically-induced event deposits were compared to local seismic intensities of the causative earthquakes, eyewitness reports, post-earthquake observations, and vegetation and geomorphology of the catchment and the lake. Megaturbidites occur where lake seiches took place. Lacustrine turbidites type 2 can be the result of: (i) local near-shore mass wasting; (ii) delta collapse; (iii) onshore landslides; (iv) debris flows or mudflows; or (v) fluvial reworking of landslide debris. On the contrary, lacustrine turbidites type 1 are the result of shallow mass wasting on sublacustrine slopes covered by hemipelagic sediments. Due to their more constrained origin, lacustrine turbidites type 1 are the most reliable type of seismically-induced event deposits in quantitative palaeoseismology, because they are almost exclusively triggered by earthquake shaking. Moreover, they most sensitively record varying seismic shaking intensities. The number of lacustrine turbidites type 1 linearly increases with increasing seismic intensity, starting with no lacustrine turbidites type 1 at intensities between V1/2 and VI and reaching 100% when intensities are higher than VII1/2. Combining different types of seismically-induced event deposits allows the reconstruction of the complete impact of an earthquake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available