4.7 Article

Moisture diffusion and hygrothermal aging in pultruded fibre reinforced polymer composites of bridge decks

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages 304-312

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.017

Keywords

A. Polymer matrix composites; C. Pultrusion; E. Environmental performance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gravimetric experimental studies were undertaken to characterise the moisture diffusion process in pultruded Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites of bridge decks exposed to the vapour environmental aging condition as well as water immersed condition at temperatures of 20 degrees C and 40 degrees C respectively. After a short-term (250 days) aging duration, the moisture weight gain curves as a function of time were obtained. Comparing with the vapour conditions, FRP composites immersed in water resulted in much higher moisture uptake levels, around 3% of the initial self-weight. Based on the one-dimensional moisture diffusion theory, the moisture diffusion coefficients of FRP composites under different aging conditions were identified by the best least-square curve fitting to the experimental data. The obtained results indicated that high temperature can speed up the moisture diffusion rate, and the moisture equilibrium contents were mainly governed by the humidity of aging environment. Large portion of polymer relaxation was evident from the experimental data in the aging condition of 20 degrees C-water and 40 degrees C-water. Moisture desorption tests confirmed that, for the aging conditions of 40 degrees C-96% relative humidity (RH) and 40 degrees C-water, mass loss of FRP composites took place. No significant variations on moisture diffusion characteristic of FRP specimens from different parts of the bridge deck element can be drawn expect that, flange part specimens absorbed less moisture content than the two web parts. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available