4.3 Article

Improvement of the Thermal Latency for Epoxy-Phenolic Resins by Novel Amphiphatic Imidazole Catalysts

Journal

MACROMOLECULAR RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 324-330

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-010-0416-1

Keywords

amphiphatic catalysts; thermal latent catalysts; epoxy-phenolic resins; polymerization; thermosets

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Republic of China [NSC95-2221-E-006-398]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel amphiphatic imidazole compounds were evaluated as thermal latent catalysts for the polymerization of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA). Amphiphatic compounds 5-9, two commercially available catalysts 1 and 2, and compounds 3 and 4 were used to cure epoxy resin systems for an investigation of their thermal latency and storage stability. The results from the cure activation energy and viscosity-storage time of the catalysts, the order of thermally latent activity was 3-phenylpropanoic acid (4) > 2-amino-3-phenylpropinoic acid (5) > 2-amino-3-(imidazole-4-yl)-propionic acid (H-His-OH, 8) > N-tert-butoxycarbonyl-histidine (9) > imidazole-4-acrylic acid (6) > 3-(imidazole-4-yl) propionic acid (7) > 1-cyanoethyl-2-ethyl-4-methyl-imidazole (2) > 2-ethyl-4-methylimidazole (1) > histamine (3). From the results, the amphiphatic imidazole catalysts 5-9 showed better thermal latency than commercialized catalysts 1 and 2, basic catalyst 3 and acidic catalyst 4. Concerning the glass transition temperature (T(g)), the use of amphiphatic imidazole catalysts 5-9 provided complete or near complete curing systems at temperatures ranging from 152-163 degrees C, which were similar to two commercially available catalysts (151-152 degrees C, 1 and 2) and histamine (159 degrees C, 3). On the other hand, the T(g) for compounds 4 and 5 could not be detected at 30-300 degrees C from the temperature scans because of their weak nucleophilicity and low cross-linking reactivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available