4.6 Article

Electrohydrodynamic Jet Process for Pore-Structure-Controlled 3D Fibrous Architecture As a Tissue Regenerative Material: Fabrication and Cellular Activities

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 30, Issue 28, Pages 8551-8557

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la501080c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST) [NRF-2012R1A2A2A01017435]
  2. Korea Health Promotion Institute [HI12C0851020014] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A2A2A01017435, 22A20130000065] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we propose a new scaffold fabrication method, direct electro-hydrodynamic jet process, using the initial jet of an electrospinning process and ethanol media as a target. The fabricated three-dimensional (3D) fibrous structure was configured with multilayered microsized struts consisting of randomly entangled micro/nanofibrous architecture, similar to that of native extracellular matrixes. The fabrication of the structure was highly dependent on various processing parameters, such as the surface tension of the target media, and the flow rate and weight fraction of the polymer solution. As a tissue regenerative material, the 3D fibrous scaffold was cultured with preosteoblasts to observe the initial cellular activities in comparison with a solid-freeform fabricated 3D scaffold sharing a similar structural geometry. The cell-culture results showed that the newly developed scaffold provided outstanding microcellular environmental conditions to the seeded cells (about 3.5-fold better initial cell attachment and 2.1-fold better cell proliferation).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available